CONTINUITY EQUATION (I)
For a general vertical coordinate s, the continuity equation is [Kasahara (1974)]:
· Transformation to an appropriate terrain-following coordinate gives the continuous form on which the New Dynamics is based.
· Omitting the local time derivative term gives various acoustically-filtered (or incompressible) forms. The precise form depends on:
¨ what we assume about r in the remaining terms;
¨ what approximations we make in other equations;
¨ whether we insist on energy conservation; and
¨ whether we choose to start from a different form of
the continuity equation!
The resulting equation sets are called – for example – Boussinesq, anelastic, modified anelastic, hybrid anelastic, pseudo-incompressible, or simply given their entrants’ names (e.g. Dutton–Fichtl, Lipps–Hemler, Ogura–Phillips, Wilhelmson–Ogura). See Davies, Staniforth, Wood and Thuburn (2003) QJRMS, in press
CONTINUITY EQUATION (II)
2. Putting s = p = pressure, and making approximations that are good if gives [Miller (1974)]:
This is the same as the familiar hydrostatic form, but no hydrostatic assumption is made. A diagnostic relation of the form (valid if ) is applied. [See White (1989). A similar stratagem was used to represent some of the Coriolis and metric terms in the Old Dynamics; see White and Bromley (1995).]
There are no vertically-propagating acoustic modes.
3. Putting s = p = hydrostatic pressure, gives [Laprise (1992)]
Note that no hydrostatic or incompressibility assumption is made: p is simply defined by . It is a nice result that the unapproximated continuity equation takes such a simple form when p is used as vertical coordinate.
See Wood and Staniforth, QJRMS January (C) 2003.
Tabular summary
Vertical acoustic modes? |
Lamb modes? |
Always valid? |
Must solve elliptic p.d.e? |
|
Full equations |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes (a) |
Laprise 1992 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes (a) |
"Anelastic" |
No |
No |
No (b) |
Yes (c) |
Miller 1974 |
No |
Yes (d) |
No (b) |
Yes (c) |
Hydrostatic |
No |
Yes (d) |
No (e) |
No |
Notes: